Berpikir pseudo mahasiswa PGSD pada operasi bilangan bulat
Abstract
The lack of mastery of mathematical concepts is found in PGSD students, especially in integer matter. This is a serious problem because as a potential teacher, PGSD students must have a correct understanding of a concept. One reason for this lack of mastery of the concept is due to the fragile construction of knowledge. This knowledge construction error can be a pseudo bepikir, that is pseudo wrong and pseudo true. Pseudo is true when the student can answer a problem problem correctly, but the reasoning is wrong. On the contrary, pseudo is wrong when the student answers wrong, but the reasoning is correct. This pseudo-thinking is examined using qualitative research design. The subjects of this research are 24 students of PGSD STKIP PGRI Banjarmasin in the odd semester of academic year 2017/2018. The results showed that most of PGSD students who take the subjects of Mathematics Study of SD I had pseudo thinking on the matter of integer operation. Twenty-one students experienced true pseudo and one student experienced pseudo thinking wrong. These results indicate that PGSD students are able to perform integer operations, but are unable to construct the concept of integer operations well because the process is procedural.
Downloads
References
Al Jupri, Drijvers, P. & Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Student Difficulties in Solving Equations from an Operational and a Structural Perspective. Mathematics.
Chambers, P. (2008). Teaching mathematics. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 4th Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Haylock, D., & Thangata, F. (2007). Key concept in teaching primary mathematics. Los Angeles – London – New Delhi – Singapore: SAGE Publication.
Hewitt, D. (2008). Understanding effective learning: strategies for the classroom. London: The Mc Graw. Hill Companies.
Hudojo, H. (2005). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: UM Press.
Kementerian. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 65, tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Koicu, B., Harel, G. & Manaster, A. (2013). Ways of thinking associated with mathematics teachers’problem posing in the context of division of fractions. Instr Sci, 41: 681-698.
Oksuz, C. (2007). Children’s Understanding of Equality and the Equal Symbol. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, August 1st, (Online), http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/, diakses tanggal 5 Oktober 2017.
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Santrock, J. (2013). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Subanji. (2013). Pembelajaran Matematika Kreatif dan Inovatif. Malang: UM Press.
Subanji. (2015). Teori Kesalahan Konstruksi Konsep dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Subanji & Nusantantara, T. (2013). Karakterisasi Kesalahan Berpikir Siswa dalam Mengkonstruksi Konsep Matematika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19 (2): 208-217,
Tuna, A. (2013). A Conceptual Analysis of the Knowledge of Prospective Mathematics Teachers about Degree and Radian. World Journal of Education, 3 (4), (Online), www.sciedu.ca/wje, diakses tanggal 7 Oktober 2017.
Ureyen, M., Mahir, N. & Cetin, N. (2006). The Mistakes Made by the Students Taking a Calculus Course in Solving Inequalities. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, November, 30th, (Online), http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/, diakses tanggal 5 Oktober 2017
Veloo, A., Krishnasamy, H. N. & Abdullah, W. S. W. (2015). Types of Student Errors in Mathematical Symbols, Graphs and Problem-Solving. Asian Social Science, 15 (15): 324-334.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright by Author(s)
