| Additional menu |
|---|
| Make a Submission |
| Author Guidelines |
| Focus and Scope |
| Editorial Team |
| Reviewers |
| Publication Ethics |
| Editorial Process |
| Publishing System |
| How to Use Mendeley |
| Other Journals |
Editorial Process
Ensuring Fair and Reliable Peer Review
- Submission:
- Authors submit their research manuscripts through an online submission system.
- The manuscript should adhere to the journal's guidelines and scope.
- Initial Review:
- The Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor conducts an initial review to assess the manuscript's suitability for the journal.
- They check for adherence to ethical guidelines, scope, originality, and significance of the research.
- Peer Review:
- The manuscript undergoes a rigorous peer review process to evaluate its scientific merit and validity.
- The Editor assigns the manuscript to expert reviewers who are well-versed in the subject matter.
- Reviewers remain anonymous to ensure unbiased evaluations.
- Reviewer Assessment:
- Reviewers thoroughly analyze the manuscript, looking for strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements.
- They provide constructive feedback to help authors enhance their work.
- Editorial Decision:
- Based on the reviewers' assessments, the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor makes an editorial decision.
- Possible decisions include acceptance, minor/major revisions, or rejection.
- Author Revision:
- If revisions are requested, authors are given an opportunity to address reviewers' comments and enhance their work.
- The revised manuscript is reevaluated to ensure the required changes have been adequately addressed.
- Final Decision:
- The Editor makes a final decision based on the revised manuscript and its response to reviewers' comments.
- The decision reflects the scientific rigor, significance, and adherence to the journal's guidelines.
- Editing and Proofreading:
- Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting and formatting to ensure clarity and consistency.
- Authors may receive proofs for final review and approval.
- Publication:
- Once accepted and finalized, the manuscript is published in the journal's upcoming issue or made available online.
Principles Guiding the Editorial Process:
- Fairness: The editorial process is unbiased and impartial, treating all submissions based on merit, irrespective of the authors' backgrounds or affiliations.
- Transparency: The entire process is transparent, and authors receive clear explanations of editorial decisions.
- Confidentiality: Reviewers' identities are kept confidential to encourage honest and impartial evaluations.
- Integrity: The process upholds the principles of research integrity and ethical conduct, deterring plagiarism, fraud, or any unethical practices.
- Constructive Feedback: Reviewers provide constructive feedback to help authors improve their research.
- Timeliness: The process aims to be prompt in delivering decisions, maintaining efficient communication between all parties.
- Open Access: Journals may adopt an open access policy, making research freely accessible to the public, further promoting transparency and collaboration.
By adhering to these principles and following a systematic editorial process, journals strive to publish high-quality research that contributes to the advancement of knowledge in their respective fields, fostering credibility and trust within the academic community and beyond.
