Minat dan hasil belajar pada blended learning di Papua Barat
Interest and learning achievement of mathematics on blended learning in West Papua
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui minat dan hasil belajar mahasiswa melalui blended learning. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa semester II Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong, Papua Barat, Indonesia yang berjumlah 31 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan tes dan non tes dengan Instrumen yang digunakan adalah angket minat belajar dan Tes hasil belajar, serta dokumentasi. Hasil Belajar secara umum rata-rata nilai mahasiswa adalah 76 yang menunjukkan bahwa interpretasi nilai mahasiswa adalah “AB” atau 3.50 dan rata-rata indikator pencapaian kompetensi pada mata kuliah kalkulus integral keseluruhan berada pada kategori tinggi. Hasil analisis total angket minat belajar diperoleh hasil 90,91% berada pada kategori sangat tinggi. Persentase rata-rata tiap indikator minat berada pada rentang kategori Sangat Tinggi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa blended learning dapat membangkitkan minat dan perhatian mahasiswa serta berdampak positif terhadap hasil belajar, sehingga dalam menerapkan blended learning semua komponen pendukung harus diperhatikan untuk menciptakan pengalaman belajar yang optimal.
Downloads
References
Amenduni, F., & Ligorio, M. B. (2022). Blended Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: An International Perspective. In Education Sciences (Vol. 12, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020129
Arikunto, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Bent, M., Velazquez-Godinez, E., & de Jong, F. (2021). Becoming an expert teacher: Assessing expertise growth in peer feedback video recordings by lexical analysis. Education Sciences, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110665
Bryan, A., & Volchenkova, K. N. (2016). Blended Learning: Definition, Models, Implications for Higher Education. Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series “Education. Education Sciences,” 8(2), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.14529/ped160204
Crawford, R., & Jenkins, L. (2017). Blended learning and team teaching: Adapting pedagogy in response to the changing digital tertiary environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2924
Elliott, S. N. (2001). Educational psycology: effective teachin. effective learning (3rd ed). McGraw-Hill.
Irwan, Angraini, R., & Tiara, M. (2020). Analysis of Student Interest on Blended Learning. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200803.041
Kurnia, S., Hidayat, S., & Wardhani, S. (2021). Analisis Minat dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa pada Pembelajaran Daring di SMA Negeri Purwodadi Kabupaten Musi Rawas. BIODIK, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v7i4.14489
Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes. Mitra Cendekia Press.
Nasution, F. H., Hasibuan, I. S., & Lubis, J. A. (2017). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation (GI). PeTeKa, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.31604/ptk.v1i1.28-33
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational Assessment of Students Sixth Edition. In Pearson New International Edition.
Ritella, G., & Loperfido, F. F. (2021). Students’ self-organization of the learning environment during a blended knowledge creation course. Education Sciences, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100580
Ross, B., & Gage, K. (2006). Global perspectives on blended learning: Insight from WebCT and our customers in higher education. In The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs.
Sansone, N., Cesareni, D., Bortolotti, I., & McLay, K. F. (2021). The designing and re-designing of a blended university course based on the trialogical learning approach. Education Sciences, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100591
Savickas, M. L., & Spokane, A. R. (1999). Vocational interests: meaning measurement and counseling use. Davies-Black Publishing.
Schunk, D., Meece, J., & Pintrich, P. (2014). Pearson New International Edition: Motivation in Education Theory, Research, and Applications. In British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
Seifert, K., & Sutton, R. (2009). Educational psychology (2nd ed). Jacobs Fondation.
Sirait, E. D. (2016). Pengaruh Minat Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v6i1.750
So, H. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2010). Examining the roles of blended learning approaches in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments: A delphi study. Educational Technology and Society, 13(3).
Soliman, D., Costa, S., & Scardamalia, M. (2021). Knowledge building in online mode: Insights and reflections. Education Sciences, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080425
Stahl, G. (2021). Redesigning mathematical curriculum for blended learning. Education Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040165
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif ,Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Wicaksana, G. A., Nurhayati, S., & Cahyono, E. (2013). Efektifitas Media E-Lerning Berbasis Chemo-Edutainment Terhadap Hasil Belajar Hidrokarbon Dan Minyak Bumi Kelas X. Journal of Chemisry in Education, Vo 2 No 1.
Wichadee, S. (2017). A development of the blended learning model using edmodo for maximizing students’ oral proficiency and motivation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet. v12i02.6324
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright by Author(s)
