Pengembangan perangkat penilaian autentik untuk pembelajaran matematika di kelas VIII semester 1

Rolina Amriyanti Ferita

doi:10.33654/math.v3i1.126

Rolina Amriyanti Ferita UNU Kalimantan Selatan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v3i1.126

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat penilaian autentik untuk pembelajaran matematika di kelas VII semester 1 yang autentik, reliabel dan valid meliputi instrumen dengan kompetensi dasar bilangan bulat, garis dan sudut, serta rasio dan perbandingan untuk penilaian KI 1, KI 2, KI 3, dan KI 4 berupa: indikator, instrumen penilaian, dan rubrik penilaian. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan (research & development). Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan model pengembangan Plomp (2010) tiga tahap pengembangan yaitu preliminary research, prototyping phase, dan assessment phase. Aspek reliabilitas dari uji coba lapangan. Aspek kevalidan perangkat pembelajaran ditinjau dari penilaian para ahli. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa untuk aspek penilaian autentik berupa aspek konteks dan tugas memperoleh kategori baik, sedangkan aspek peserta didik dan indikator memperoleh kategori sangat baik. Perangkat yang dikembangkan juga telah memenuhi taraf konsistensi dan reliabilitas, dengan hasil penilaian kualitas oleh ahli memperoleh kategori valid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rolina Amriyanti Ferita, UNU Kalimantan Selatan

Prodi Pendidikan Matematika

References

Ambrosetti, D. D. & Cho, G. (2005). Synergism in learning: a critical reflection of authentic assessment. The University of North Carolina Press. 57-60.

Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom assessment: enhancing the quality of teacher decision making. New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Frey, B. B. & Schmitt, V. L. (2007). Coming to term with classroom assessment. Journal of Advanced Academic, 18, 402-423.

Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L. & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Journal Volume 17 Number 2 January 2012, 1531-7714.

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. ETR&D, Vol.52, No. 3, 2004, 67-86.

Herrington, J. & Herrington, A. (2006). Authentic conditions for authentic assessment:aligning task and assessment, in critical Vision. Proceedings of the 29th HERDSA Annual Conference, 10-12 July 2006, 146-151.

Hyde, D. P. (2013). What makes a good secondary assessment? On achieving the aim of assessment. Journal Education and Practice, Vol.4, No.12, 188-197.
Indiana Departement of Education. (tanpa tahun). Authentic assessment. Indiana Departement of Education. Diambil tanggal 26 September 2013, dari www.msdwt.k12.in.us/msd/wp-content/.../10/authentic_assessment.pdf.

Kemdikbud. (2012). Pengembangan kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Kemdikbud. (2014). Model penilaian pencapaian kompetensi peserta didik Sekolah Penengah Pertama. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Lai, E. R. (2011). Performance-based assessment: some new thoughts on an old idea. Bulletin Pearson Education, May 2011 Issue 20, 1-4.

Moon, T. R., et. al. (2005). Development of authentic assessment for the middle school classroom. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, Vol. XVI. No.2/3. Winter/Spring 2005, 119-133.

Newmann, F.M & Wehalage, G.G. (1993). Five standard of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8-12.

Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M.. (2011). Educational assesment of students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Plomp. (2010). Educational design research: an introduction. Dalam Plomp, T. & Nieveen, N. (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007. (3rd print, pp. 9-35). Netherland: Netherland Institute for Curriculum Development.

Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. New York: Pearson.

Shapiro, E. S. (2011). Academic skills problems: direct assessment and intervention. 4thed. New York: The Guilford Press.

Sudiyatno. (2010). Pengembangan model penilaian komprehensif unjuk kerja siswa pada pembelajaran berbasis standar kompetensi di SMK Teknologi Industry. Disertasi Doktor pada PPs UNY: Tidak diterbitkan.

Weber, M. & Stewart, B. R. (2001). Authentic assessment: good or bad?. ProQuest Agricultural Journal, The Agricultural Education Magazine, Mar/Apr 2001, 73, 5, 14.

Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: exlporing the purpose and limits of testing. New York: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Wright, R. J. (2008). Educational assessment: test and measurements in the age of accountability. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.