Validasi modul Solve It untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan soal cerita matematika
Validation of Solve It module to improve math story ability
Abstract
Kemampuan menggunakan strategi pemecahan soal cerita matematika pada peserta didik sekolah dasar berperan penting pada pembelajaran matematika ketika peserta berada di sekolah menengah pertama. Oleh karena itu, penggunaan strategi pemecahan yang tepat diperlukan dalam belajar soal cerita matematika. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memvalidasi modul mengenai strategi pemecahan soal cerita yang diberi nama Solve It dan menerapkan modul Solve It untuk meningkatkan kemampuan melakukan pemecahan soal cerita. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini yaitu guru sekolah dasar sebagai penilai ahli untuk melakukan validasi modul dan siswa sekolah dasar di Yogyakarta yang terlibat dalam penelitian eksperimen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa modul Solve It memiliki nilai validitas isi yang tinggi. Di sisi lain, para siswa yang dilatih dengan strategi Solve It mengalami peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan soal cerita. Temuan ini memberikan sumbangan bagi pengembangan teori kognitif mengenai peran penting metakognitif dalam mengontrol proses berpikir bagi siswa yang berkesulitan matematika.
Downloads
References
Azwar, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Psikologi (2nd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Bahri, S., Bustamam, N., & Alfira, S. (2021). Modul Pelatihan Asertif untuk Meningkatkan Penyesuaian Sosial Remaja. Jurnal Pencerahan, 15(2), 1693–7775.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2002). Language and Mathematical Problem Solving Among Bilinguals. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 136(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209604156
Boonen, A. J. H., van Wesel, F., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2014). The Role of Visual Representation Type, Spatial Ability, and Reading Comprehension in Word Problem Solving: An Item-level Analysis in Elementary School Children. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.08.001
Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word Problems: A Review of Linguistic and Numerical Factors Contributing to Their Difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(APR), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., Cutting, L. E., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2019). Connections Between Reading Comprehension and Word-Problem Solving via Oral Language Comprehension: Implications for Comorbid Learning Disabilities. In New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development (Vol. 2019, Issue 165, pp. 73–90). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20288
Holmes, S. D., He, Q., & Meadows, M. (2017). An investigation of Construct Relevant and Irrelevant Features of Mathematics Problem-Solving Questions Using Comparative Judgement and Kelly’s Repertory Grid. Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1334576
Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student Difficulties in Mathematizing Word Problems in Algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481–2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a
Krawec, J., Huang, J., Montague, M., Kressler, B., & de Alba, A. M. (2013). The Effects of Cognitive Strategy Instruction on Knowledge of Math Problem-Solving Processes of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712463368
Made, N., Agustini, Y. A., & Andayani, B. (2017). Validasi Modul “CAKAP” untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Sosial Mahasiswa Baru Asal Bali. Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology, 3(1), 1–13.
Marzocchi, G. M., Lucangeli, D., De Meo, T., Fini, F., & Cornoldi, C. (2002). The Disturbing Effect of Irrelevant Information on Arithmetic Problem Solving in Inattentive Children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 21(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2101_4
Menon, V. (2016). Memory and Cognitive Control Circuits in Mathematical Cognition and Learning. Progress in Brain Research, 227, 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.026
Montague, M., Krawec, J., Enders, C., & Dietz, S. (2014). The Effects of Cognitive Strategy Instruction on Math Problem Solving of Middle-School Students of Varying Ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035I76
Montague, M., Warger, C., & Morgan, T. H. (2000). Solve It! Strategy Instruction to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1502_7
Nugroho, S. A., & Jailani, J. (2019). The Effectiveness of Concrete Representational Abstract Approach (CRA) Approach and Problem-Solving Approach on Mathematical Representation Ability at Elementary School. ICMEd: International Conference on Meaningful Education, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4620
Nurharyanto, D. W., & Retnawati, H. (2020). The Difficulties of the Elementary School Students in Solving the Mathematical Narrative Test Items. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i1.29969
Özkubat, U., Karabulut, A., & Özmen, E. R. (2020). Mathematical Problem-Solving Processes of Students with Special Needs: A Cognitive Strategy Instruction Model “Solve It!” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020562131
Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2018). Effective Word-Problem Instruction: Using Schemas to Facilitate Mathematical Reasoning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918777250
Rajadurai, R., & Ganapathy, H. (2023). Effect of Use of Metacognitive Instructional Strategies in Promoting Mathematical Problem-Solving Competence Amongst Undergraduate Students in Facing Competitive Examination. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2173103
Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
Rosli, S., Shahrill, M., & Yusof, J. (2020). Applying the Hybrid Strategy in Solving Mathematical Word Problems at the Elementary School Level. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.965
Sesanti, N. R., & Bere, M. G. S. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Kelas III Sekolah Dasar dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematika Bentuk Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Teori Newman. JIP: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(7), 1459–1464.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. D. (2014). Supra-personal Cognitive Control and Metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006
Siregar, N. R. (2022). Validasi Modul “FOPS” untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Soal Cerita Matematika. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i1.4481
Siregar, N. R., Wimbarti, S., Kusrohmaniah, S., & Sunardi, Y. (2020). Adaptasi Test of Mathematical Ability (TOMA-3). JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 4(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v4i2.3218
Wang, A. Y., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2016). Cognitive and Linguistic Predictors of Mathematical Word Problems with and without Irrelevant Information. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.015
Wischgoll, A. (2016). Combined Training of One Cognitive and One Metacognitive Strategy Improves Academic Writing Skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00187
Zhang, L., Yu, S., Li, B., & Wang, J. (2017). Can Students Identify the Relevant Information to Solve a Problem? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 288–299. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26229224
Zhu, N. (2015). Cognitive Strategy Instruction for Mathematical Word Problem-Solving of Students with Mathematics Disabilities in China. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62(6), 608–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1077935
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright by Author(s)
